Vincent Lingga , The Jakarta Post , Jakarta Wed, 06/18/2008 10:44 AM Headlines
It was visionary business acumen on the part of Singapore government-owned Temasek Holdings when its subsidiary, ST Telemedia (STT), acquired, through an international competitive bid, around 40 percent of state-owned PT Indosat telecommunications company, at a premium price of more than 51 percent in late 2002.
It was similarly clever of STT when it decided on June 7 to divest its entire Indosat stake and sell the asset to Qatar Telecom at a price of US$1.8 billion, thereby booking a hefty profit of more than $1 billion.
Yet most important is that in one stroke, Temasek and its subsidiary removed the single root cause of the messy legal and political debacle and the harassment they had encountered over the past two years--cross-ownership in Indosat and Telkomsel.
The deal was a normal corporate action by a wise management to protect the interests of shareholders, in this case the Singapore people. Making a divestment under duress or under the force of a court ruling certainly would not be in the best interests of the Singapore taxpayers who own Temasek.
Selling the stake to Qatar Telecom also was simultaneously a clever business and political decision.
It was politically a shrewd move because Indonesia has been going all out to woo investment from countries in the Middle East, which have enjoyed windfall profits from skyrocketing oil prices. Qatar Telecom's experiences with the Indosat deal could influence other investors from the Gulf with regard to investment environment in Indonesia.
The deal fits well with Qatar Telecom's investment agenda as this company has been eagerly eyeing opportunities in Indonesia's high-growth, lucrative telecommunications business.
Little wonder Qatar Telecom was willing to pay a premium price of almost 31 percent for the Indosat shares despite the ongoing litigation process. But the high-value deal also shows how Indosat, which in 2002 grappled with a steeply declining market share, has become a jewel over the past six years.
Qatar Telecom is the second Gulf investor in Indonesia's telecommunications industry after Saudi Telecom, which holds a significant stake in Axis mobile operator, a new player in the cellular market.
STT made the divestment move one month after the Central Jakarta District Court decided to uphold the November 2007 ruling of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU), which ordered Temasek and its subsidiaries to divest their entire stake in either Indosat or PT Telkomsel.
Temasek owns indirectly, through its subsidiary, Singapore Telecommunications Ltd., 35 percent of state-controlled Telkomsel.
The KPPU ruling was based on Temasek's indirect cross-ownership at both Indosat and Telkomsel, which, the competition watchdog said, led to unfair business practices such as price-fixing to control the mobile phone market.
Even though both Temasek and STT denied the divestment had anything to do with the court ruling, the confusing logic and illogical grounds of the court's decision understandably horrified the Singapore companies about the future of their investments in both telecom companies.
The KPPU certainly was upset by the divestment, calling the transaction an insult to legal procedures in Indonesia because the case is still pending at the Supreme Court.
Temasek and its subsidiaries appealed the lower court rulings, but the political and public opinion harassment they have endured over the past two years, and their bizarre experiences with the court system here, gave them second thoughts about the due legal process at the Supreme Court.
The Singapore companies simply felt trapped in a legal black hole. Hence, their decision to divest and sell their Indosat stake to Qatar Telecom is understandable.
The critics who from the outset opposed Temasek's indirect ownership in Indosat may consider its profit from the divestment as coming at the expense of Indonesian interests.
But we see it simply as just reward for a long-term, visionary investor. It was a bold decision for Temasek and its subsidiaries to take the plunge in 2002, investing $630 million (the acquisition price) in Indonesia when most foreign investors were still shunning the country, given its political and business risks amid the messy transition to democracy.
It is thus not a business sin for Temasek and its subsidiary to rake in a profit of $1 billion from an investment made six years ago in an extremely risky environment.
Analogous with the Temasek investment in 2002 was the move by state-owned Malaysian firm Guthrie to acquire for $350 million around 200,000 hectares of oil palm plantations, spread out over several provinces,in mid-2001.
The acquisition, made from the Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency, was also criticized by analysts as a major gamble.
That was because the acquisition was made when world palm oil prices were at an eight-year low and when many natural resource-based companies were mired in imbroglios as a result of the excesses of regional autonomy, which was introduced in January 2001.
But no one can blame Guthrie for reaping huge profits since late 2006 as a result of skyrocketing palm oil prices. And if Guthrie were to divest its plantation investments now, it could well make a killing, pocketing several billion dollars in profit.
No comments:
Post a Comment